IEEE.org     |     IEEE Xplore Digital Library     |     IEEE Standards     |     IEEE Spectrum     |     More Sites

Commit f117420c authored by Alfredo Herrera's avatar Alfredo Herrera
Browse files

Minutes/2020Week21_19May.md updated from https://stackedit.io/

parent 1cc1e9be
......@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ Finally, the following topics were discussed:
- **[\[ACTION ITEM\]](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/22)** there is a need to define the value proposition that peer-review adds to open source designs. One way to describe the value proposition was shared on a [LinkedIn article](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/peer-review-open-source-alfredo-herrera-p-eng-msc-ieee-sm/) and is added here to spark our discussion:
> if two projects start from the same source files, by submitting one of them to planned review(s) by a group of subject-matter-experts (i.e. peers): it is reasonable to expect that through this process the design would gain a higher level of quality than the project that did not use peer-review.
- @zack suggested to clarify the "call for participation" template by adding to the first sentence a description of the new IEEE platform. THis has been added to
h. revisit next call how to ask for wide participation form IEEE members into our committee. It depends on update to "Call for Participation" text and help from Marketing.
- @zack suggested to clarify the "call for participation" template by adding to the first sentence a description of the new IEEE platform. This has been added to [Issue 20](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/20)
- **[ACTION ITEM]** revisit next call how to ask for wide participation form IEEE members into our committee. It depends on update to "Call for Participation" text and help from Marketing.
=> Specify that we are designing services, not calling for reviewers yet
=> set expectations clearly
g. remove "design from 5th bullet insight...
......@@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ Finally, the following topics were discussed:
> Written with [StackEdit](https://stackedit.io/).
<!--stackedit_data:
eyJoaXN0b3J5IjpbLTE4MTg5ODY5MTcsLTk2NTY5NzYyLDE2Nj
AyNzc1NDksLTIxMDE5MjU3NzMsODYxMzYwMywxNzA4MjU2NjYx
LDM2ODgzMDQ0Nyw1MjYxNTgwMiwtMTM1Nzk1NTE0OSwtMTc2Mj
YzNDc2NCwtOTg3OTE3OTg5LDE2NzA3MjAxNTQsOTQ4NjU0NCwx
NDYxMjIyMTMwLC04NDQ4MzIzOTUsNzM5MTM0MjgzXX0=
eyJoaXN0b3J5IjpbMzA4MTkxOTEsLTk2NTY5NzYyLDE2NjAyNz
c1NDksLTIxMDE5MjU3NzMsODYxMzYwMywxNzA4MjU2NjYxLDM2
ODgzMDQ0Nyw1MjYxNTgwMiwtMTM1Nzk1NTE0OSwtMTc2MjYzND
c2NCwtOTg3OTE3OTg5LDE2NzA3MjAxNTQsOTQ4NjU0NCwxNDYx
MjIyMTMwLC04NDQ4MzIzOTUsNzM5MTM0MjgzXX0=
-->
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment