@@ -21,8 +21,7 @@ We discussed the importance of peer-review of open source designs at IEEE based
* The entrenchment in OSCom's Operations manual of an [open-source peer-review](https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/OSCOM_Operations_Manual.pdf) service
* (not discussed on call, but added for reference) The commitment by the IEEE Standards Association to open source [URL](url)
-**[\[ACTION ITEM\]](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/23)** after clarifications from IEEE-SA and we discussed the idea of asking IEEE-SA marketing to help us send a "Call for participation" email to all of IEEE; but it was decided to discuss this on our next call
-**** it was suggested to remove "design" from first bullet in the **"Request for participation"** section of the "Call for participation" template. Issue was created to allow for discussion prior to change.
-**[\[ACTION ITEM\]](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/23)** Alfredo to send text to [Melissa Aranzamendez](@m.aranzamendez) to get IEEE-SA help in sending
#### 3. General discussion:
Finally, the following topics were discussed:
...
...
@@ -36,6 +35,6 @@ These meeting minutes mark the beginning of use of the Issues functionality in t
> Written with [StackEdit](https://stackedit.io/).
