|     IEEE Xplore Digital Library     |     IEEE Standards     |     IEEE Spectrum     |     More Sites

Commit 8afc0dbf authored by Alfredo Herrera's avatar Alfredo Herrera
Browse files

Minutes/ updated from

parent a2c8e83d
......@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Finally, the following topics were discussed:
> if two projects start from the same source files, by submitting one of them to planned review(s) by a group of subject-matter-experts (i.e. peers): it is reasonable to expect that through this process the design would gain a higher level of quality than the project that did not use peer-review.
- @zack suggested to clarify the "call for participation" template by adding to the first sentence a description of the new IEEE platform. This has been added to [Issue 20](
- **[\[ACTION ITEM\]](** w revisit next call how to ask for wide participation form IEEE members into our committee. It depends on update to "Call for Participation" text and help from Marketing.
- **[\[ACTION ITEM\]](** we discussed the idea of asking IEEE-SA marketing to help us send a "Call for participation" email to all of IEEE; but it was decided to discuss this on our next call. It depends on update to "Call for Participation" text and help from Marketing.
=> Specify that we are designing services, not calling for reviewers yet
=> set expectations clearly
g. remove "design from 5th bullet insight...
......@@ -48,10 +48,10 @@ Finally, the following topics were discussed:
> Written with [StackEdit](
\ No newline at end of file
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment