|     IEEE Xplore Digital Library     |     IEEE Standards     |     IEEE Spectrum     |     More Sites

Commit 6f6104cc authored by Alfredo Herrera's avatar Alfredo Herrera
Browse files

Minutes/ updated from

parent d6e309d0
......@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ Finally, the following topics were discussed:
- **[\[ACTION ITEM\]](** there is a need to define the value proposition that peer-review adds to open source designs. One way to describe the value proposition was shared on a [LinkedIn article]( and is added here to spark our discussion:
> if two projects start from the same source files, by submitting one of them to planned review(s) by a group of subject-matter-experts (i.e. peers): it is reasonable to expect that through this process the design would gain a higher level of quality than the project that did not use peer-review.
- add to first sentence "IEEEE has made available a platfor for oepn source that is blah, blah, blah..."
f. add the definition what an "official IEEE open source project is" and how this pee-review provides value to that specific type of project
g. add to first sentence "IEEEE has made available a platfor for oepn source that is blah, blah, blah..."
h. revisit next call how to ask for wide participation form IEEE members into our committee. It depends on update to "Call for Participation" text and help from Marketing.
=> Specify that we are designing services, not calling for reviewers yet
=> set expectations clearly
......@@ -48,9 +49,9 @@ Finally, the following topics were discussed:
> Written with [StackEdit](
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment