IEEE.org     |     IEEE Xplore Digital Library     |     IEEE Standards     |     IEEE Spectrum     |     More Sites

Commit 3a34981e authored by Alfredo Herrera's avatar Alfredo Herrera
Browse files

Minutes/2020Week23_2June.md updated from https://stackedit.io/

parent 57467ed3
......@@ -5,23 +5,16 @@
Updates directly on issue,
| Task (Issue URL) | Assignee | Planned completion date | Actual completion date (status) |
|----------------------|----------|----------|----------|
|[Service definition](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/15) | @zack | TBD || TBD |
|[Request procedure](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/16) | @zack, @emilio.velis | TBD || TBD |
|[Reviewer acknowledgement](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/17) | @MakerTobey| TBD || TBD |
|[Implementation](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/18) | @alfredo.herrera | TBD || TBD |
|[Maintainer Manual language](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/19) | @alfredo.herrera | TBD || TBD |
| | @alfredo.herrera | TBD || TBD |
#### 2. Alignment with IEEE
Emails were sent to a few [IEEE Societies and Technical Councils](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qWVfBJpXmz-Lk0sxTnT9lIMRjCd0dIxrFEcSWlymjjc/edit?usp=sharing) for participation in the open source peer review committee. Based on the feedback received, the following items need clarification:
- Clarify why IEEE-SA has established the[Open Source Committee](https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/OSCOM_Operations_Manual.pdf) instead of assuming it is commonly known.
- Clarify the value of open source for IEEE Societies and Technical Councils
- Clarify the object of peer review for open source on the IEEE platform, and also:
* that there will be a process to request peer review of projects on the IEEE platform
* that service is initially aimed at official IEEE open source projects
* that the open source peer review committee will help establish a list of subject-matter experts to review open source designs
- **[\[ACTION ITEM\]](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/20)** all committee members are asked to review [call for participation template](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/blob/master/Call-for-Participation.md) and to comment and suggest rewording/edits to clarify the text so that it can be sent on behalf or our committee to all of IEEE to recruit new members for our committee.
|[Service definition](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/15) | @zack | TBD | TBD |
|[Request procedure](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/16) | @zack, @emilio.velis | TBD | TBD |
|[Reviewer acknowledgement](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/17) | @MakerTobey| TBD | TBD |
|[Implementation](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/18) | @alfredo.herrera | TBD | TBD |
|[Maintainer Manual language](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/19) | @alfredo.herrera | TBD | TBD |
| [Call for participation text]](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/20) | @alfredo.herrera | TBD | TBD |
#### 2. Alignment with IEEE-SA OPEN program and OSCom
- **** all committee members are asked to review [call for participation template](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/blob/master/Call-for-Participation.md) and to comment and suggest rewording/edits to clarify the text so that it can be sent on behalf or our committee to all of IEEE to recruit new members for our committee.
#### 3. General discussion:
Finally, the following topics were discussed:
......@@ -39,5 +32,5 @@ These meeting minutes mark the beginning of use of the Issues functionality in t
> Written with [StackEdit](https://stackedit.io/).
<!--stackedit_data:
eyJoaXN0b3J5IjpbLTg2MDg2OTM3MV19
eyJoaXN0b3J5IjpbLTYwMTU3ODU5Ml19
-->
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment