IEEE.org     |     IEEE Xplore Digital Library     |     IEEE Standards     |     IEEE Spectrum     |     More Sites

Commit 0db024bb authored by Alfredo Herrera's avatar Alfredo Herrera
Browse files

Minutes/2020Week21_19May.md updated from https://stackedit.io/

parent 6dba8970
...@@ -33,7 +33,10 @@ Emails were sent to a few [IEEE Societies and Technical Councils](https://docs.g ...@@ -33,7 +33,10 @@ Emails were sent to a few [IEEE Societies and Technical Councils](https://docs.g
#### 3. General discussion: #### 3. General discussion:
Finally, the following topics were discussed: Finally, the following topics were discussed:
- **[\[ACTION ITEM\]](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/21)** all committee members are asked to help clarify "the context of open source design" at IEEE: what exactly is that context? Linked to publication? Hosting of Open Research? Standards related? Project hosting? - **[\[ACTION ITEM\]](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/21)** all committee members are asked to help clarify "the context of open source design" at IEEE: what exactly is that context? Linked to publication? Hosting of Open Research? Standards related? Project hosting?
- **[\[ACTION ITEM\]](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/21)** there is a need to define the value proposition that peer-review adds to open source designs. One way to illustrate the value proposition is described in this way: - **[\[ACTION ITEM\]](https://opensource.ieee.org/community/peer-review/admin/-/issues/21)** there is a need to define the value proposition that peer-review adds to open source designs. One way to describe the value proposition was shared on :
> if two projects start from the same source files, by submitting one of them to planned review(s) by a group of subject-matter-experts (i.e. peers): it is reasonable to expect that through this process the design would gain a higher level of quality than the project that did not use peer-review.
* : same design but one with peer-review should have more intrinsic value * : same design but one with peer-review should have more intrinsic value
f. add the definition what an "official IEEE open source project is" and how this pee-review provides value to that specific type of project f. add the definition what an "official IEEE open source project is" and how this pee-review provides value to that specific type of project
...@@ -49,9 +52,9 @@ Finally, the following topics were discussed: ...@@ -49,9 +52,9 @@ Finally, the following topics were discussed:
> Written with [StackEdit](https://stackedit.io/). > Written with [StackEdit](https://stackedit.io/).
<!--stackedit_data: <!--stackedit_data:
eyJoaXN0b3J5IjpbMTc3MDE4MzQxNywtMjEwMTkyNTc3Myw4Nj eyJoaXN0b3J5IjpbLTk5MjMzMjY3LC0yMTAxOTI1NzczLDg2MT
EzNjAzLDE3MDgyNTY2NjEsMzY4ODMwNDQ3LDUyNjE1ODAyLC0x M2MDMsMTcwODI1NjY2MSwzNjg4MzA0NDcsNTI2MTU4MDIsLTEz
MzU3OTU1MTQ5LC0xNzYyNjM0NzY0LC05ODc5MTc5ODksMTY3MD NTc5NTUxNDksLTE3NjI2MzQ3NjQsLTk4NzkxNzk4OSwxNjcwNz
cyMDE1NCw5NDg2NTQ0LDE0NjEyMjIxMzAsLTg0NDgzMjM5NSw3 IwMTU0LDk0ODY1NDQsMTQ2MTIyMjEzMCwtODQ0ODMyMzk1LDcz
MzkxMzQyODNdfQ== OTEzNDI4M119
--> -->
\ No newline at end of file
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment